论《民营经济促进法》市场准入制度之实施

    On the Implementation of the Market Access System under Private Economy Promotion Law

    • 摘要: 《民营经济促进法》的颁布标志着民营经济法治保障迈入新阶段。该法第10条首次以法律形式确立全国统一大市场制度基点。地方立法作为统一大市场建设的“最后一公里”,仍然存在诸多现实障碍。部分地方政府通过创设非常规性规范变相扩张行政许可权限,导致市场准入负面清单制度出现手段异化的内卷化竞争风险。由此显现试验主义改革路径依赖下中央立法供给不足、地区经济竞争手段异化及央地立法配置技术滞后等深层矛盾。引入央地协同立法,可有效化解前述障碍,实现“自上而下”法治统一与“自下而上”制度创新相协调,与推进改革的立法原则相契合。依托包容审慎监管的平衡功能推进全国统一市场准入制度,以法制统一原则消解地方保护主义;运用比例原则确立央地立法事项界分标准,在中央立法授权与地方立法针对性实施之间实现差序配置。同时,创设立法前审查与立法后评估相衔接的全过程监督机制,强化双重审查制度衔接,形成央地立法良性互动的规范闭环。

       

      Abstract: The enactment of the Law on Promoting the Private Economy marks a new phase in the legal protection of China’s private sector. Article 10 of the law establishes for the first time a statutory foundation for a nationwide unified market system. However, local legislation—the “last mile” in constructing this unified market—still faces numerous practical obstacles. Some local governments have surreptitiously expanded administrative licensing authority through non-standard regulatory instruments, resulting in the risk of institutional instrumentalization and involutionary competition within the market access negative list system. This phenomenon underscores deeper contradictions rooted in experimentalist reform path dependence, including inadequate central legislative supply, distortions in regional economic competition strategies, and outdated techniques in central-local legislative allocation. Introducing a collaborative central-local legislative framework offers an effective solution to these challenges, aligning the “top-down” unification of the rule of law with “bottom-up” institutional innovation, which is consistent with the legislative principle of advancing reform within the legal framework. Specifically, this framework advances a nationally unified market access regime through a balanced mechanism of incentives and constraints, countering local protectionism through legal uniformity. It employs the principle of proportionality to delineate legislative boundaries between central and local authorities, enabling differentiated implementation of central legislative mandates at the local level. Furthermore, a comprehensive oversight mechanism integrating ex post legislative evaluation with filing and review procedures strengthens the articulation of dual review systems, forming a normative closed-loop for constructive interaction between central and local legislation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map