效力瑕疵执行和解协议制度的实然缺憾与应然选择——以《关于执行和解若干问题的规定》第16条为中心

    The Defects and Proper Choice of the System of Defective Execution of Settlement Agreement—Focusing on Article 16 of Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of Reconciliation

    • 摘要: 中国当前的效力瑕疵执行和解协议制度,存在权利救济情形过少、权利行使主体单一、权利行使方式不当的现实困境。这一困境是基于立法者忽视执行和解协议天生具备的私法属性,采取债权人中心主义与效率价值优先理念违背了利益衡量理念和多元价值衡平思维。为完善效力瑕疵执行和解协议制度,在理念上,应以比例原则与效率与公正衡平原则指导制度安排和司法适用。在具体规则上,应修正将执行和解协议与民事合同完全等同的制度设计:在权利救济情形层面,划定除显失公平外的所有实体法效力瑕疵为权利救济情形;在权利行使主体层面,根据实体法效力瑕疵类型重新界分权利行使主体;在权利行使方式层面,增设执行完毕后当事人权利实现的诉讼程序。

       

      Abstract: China's current system of defective execution of settlement agreement has some practical difficulties,such as too few rights relief situations,single subject of rights exercise and improper way of rights exercise. This dilemma is based on the fact that legislators ignore the inherent private law nature of the settlement agreement. The idea of creditor centrism and efficiency value priority concept they adopted is against the concept of interest measurement and the thought of multiple value balance. In order to perfect system of defective execution of settlement agreement,the principle of proportionality,efficiency and equity should be used to guide the system arrangement and judicial application. In terms of specific rules,the system design which equates the execution of settlement agreement and civil contract should be amended:In the aspect of right relief situations,we should define all the defects of effect in substantive law except obvious unfairness as the situations of right relief; In the aspect of the subject of rights exercise,the subject of the exercise of rights should be redefined according to the types of defects of effect in substantive law;In the aspect of the way of exercising the rights,we should add the procedure of realizing the rights of the parties after the execution.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map