考虑绿色溢价的两种减排方式对比分析

    The Comparative Analysis between Two Emission Abatements Considering Green Premium

    • 摘要: 在限额与交易机制背景下,考虑排放依赖型生产商实施2种减排方式:"末端减排方式"和"过程减排方式"。通过构建参数模型展示2种减排方式下,排放依赖型生产商进行运作优化的思路以及决策结果的异同。此外,市场中绿色消费者绿色偏好的涌现,虽然对排放依赖型生产商来说,相当于间接降低了减排成本,能够促进排放依赖型生产商在市场交易和减排处理之间优先选择自身减排处理,但是,如果排放依赖型生产商选择的是"过程减排方式",那么他的运作决策就需要慎重执行,因为,只有有远见的排放依赖型生产商才能抓住绿色市场的机遇并做出最优决策以获取最大的利益。对于政府来说,一方面,可以通过宏观调控排放权的交易价格来引导排放依赖型生产商去探索最佳的净化减排方案;另一方面,还可以通过低碳宣传培养消费者的低碳意识以增强排放依赖型生产商进行自身减排的主动性。

       

      Abstract: An emission-dependent manufacturer considers two types of carbon emission abatement under the cap-and-trade mechanism. They are the "end-of-pipe technology" and the "clean technology". By constructing a parametric model,this paper shows the difference between those two emission abatements about the analysis approach and decision-making results. In addition,though the emergence of green premium from green consumers in the market can decrease the cost of emission reduction in some way,if the emission-dependent manufacturer choose the "clean technology",he need to be cautious when make decision. Only a far-sighted mission-dependent manufacturer can grasp the opportunity from green market to make the optimal decision and to get maximum benefit. Finally,for the government,on the one hand,it can guide the emission-dependent manufacturer to explore its own optimal emission abatement through regulate the carbon price,on the other hand,it can enhance the mission reduction enthusiasm of the emission-dependent manufacturer by increasing consumers' low-carbon awareness.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map